The delete performance will probably be similar, but standard partitions in postgres have a bunch of current limitations. For example, the insert pipeline is s

The delete performance will probably be similar, but standard partitions in postgres have a bunch of current limitations. For example, the insert pipeline is still quite a bit slower, partition creation is still manual, can't do as good constraint exclusion at query time, can't do certain query optimizations we've built in, can't support user-defined triggers, can't handle UPSERTs, doesn't support various constraints, can't do VACUUMing across the hierarchy, etc. We plan to write a blog post comparing against PG10 partitioning in the future to expand on this a bit. All this said, we do love Postgres and realize that it's trying to provide a more general-purpose solution, so don't mean this as criticism. We can just build something more targeted at the time-series problem.