2 ms·
IANAL, but is it really a "taking" if the state wants him to maintain the existing level of access that the previous owner provided? At that point the public ac
by Analemma_ 9y ago
IANAL, but is it really a "taking" if the state wants him to maintain the existing level of access that the previous owner provided? At that point the public access seems to be implicitly part of the property he purchased and nothing is being expropriated.
- kafkaesq 9y agoIANAL, but is it really a "taking" if the state wants him to maintain the existing level of access that the previous owner provided? No, of course not. And that's the whole point that's been finally upheld by the Court.