4 ms·
I think people don't give leadership the value it deserves. Baller made MS what it was, and Satya is largely responsible for turning the ship around. I've conc
by slackingoff2017 9y ago
I think people don't give leadership the value it deserves. Baller made MS what it was, and Satya is largely responsible for turning the ship around.
I've concluded that the leadership of IBM is what blows, and the C level offices should be gutted and replaced with whatever good engineers remain.
I've seen leadership make or break every organization I've been a part of
- gchokov 9y agoSatya is largely responsible indeed, but he is just executing on the foundations laid out before him. The foundations were shaky, but they were still the right ones. I think too much credit is given to Satya. Maybe people just wanted to see someone better than the previous CEO.