4 ms·
OP's quotation is not speaking of freedom generally, which you are; it is speaking of freedom within the corporation, i.e., you are there and you do not leave.
by obstacle1 9y ago
OP's quotation is not speaking of freedom generally, which you are; it is speaking of freedom within the corporation, i.e., you are there and you do not leave.
>Comparing it to Stalinism is silly, and surely disrespects
No, making a comparison of abstract forms of government is not in any way disrespectful to people who lived under a regime. It can only be construed as disrespectful if you are looking for an emotional tangent to distract people reading from the argument at hand (which, incidentally, indicates that you know your argument is bad!)
- _dps 9y agoBy exercising your freedom to negotiate and threatening to use your freedom to leave, you can attempt to cause changes in the corporation. Please don't attempt to tell me that I know my argument is bad.
- obstacle1 9y ago>Please don't attempt to tell me that I know my argument is bad. I didn't attempt to tell you that, I did tell you that.
- jules 9y agoThe freedom to leave gives you leverage within the company, even if you don't leave. Imagine how it would be within companies if the government forced people to stay.
- smoyer 9y agoEffectively this is what Utah's new non-compete laws achieve. You won't leave if you can't work at another company in your field.