4 ms·
This seems to be mostly concerned with the rules for when someone should be recused? There seems to be no discussion of the right to record anyone anywhere, pre
by mseebach 9y ago
This seems to be mostly concerned with the rules for when someone should be recused? There seems to be no discussion of the right to record anyone anywhere, presumably that was covered in the previous, appealed/upheld judgement? Do you have a link to that?
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- c0nfused 9y agoThis is the judgement in question. It has no bearing on free speech and should not be presented as doing so by anyone. If you can find a different case involving Akins on July 25th you are welcome to link to it instead. http://media.ca8.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/opnByMM.pl?theMM=07&theYY=2017&A1=Get+Opinions http://media.ca8.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/opnByMM.pl?theMM=07&th...
- leereeves 9y agoThis is the district court ruling: http://courtweb.pamd.uscourts.gov/courtwebsearch/mowd/BNJpmRPFlI.pdf http://courtweb.pamd.uscourts.gov/courtwebsearch/mowd/BNJpmR...