5 ms·
PAM Vulnerability in Ubuntu allowing root access
- rufugee 16y agoAnyone care to describe how this can be used to gain root? I'm running Lucid...it'd be interesting to try the hack on myself before updating...
- Kototama 16y agoJust one tweet will do it ;-) https://twitter.com/jonoberheide/status/18009527979 https://twitter.com/jonoberheide/status/18009527979
- someone_here 16y agoThat's incredible.
- qjz 16y agoWorks for me on Mint (a Ubuntu derivative). I'm glad I use Slackware on my production machines (no PAM).
- openfly 16y agoIt looks like a user could reset an environment variable, resulting in convincing the PAM module ( running as root ) to write a file somewhere the user should not be able to write. I assume since this could allow root access, it can overwrite something that can be executed as root by another process.
- nuclear_eclipse 16y agoActually, from the looks of the tweet linked above, it seems to allow a user to chown an arbitrary system file so that it is owned by him, in that case the shadow file. Having access to the shadow file would allow the user to trivially reset the password for every account on the machine, including root. With that access, a user could then do just about anything to the box, and then reset the password/shadow file back to its old value/permissions so that sysadmins would be none the wiser.
- openfly 16y agoNeat. Similar idea but definitely different.
- barnaby 16y agoThank you for posting this... I often ignore doing updates because they're just not as interesting as other things I'm doing. This kicked my butt into gear to install the updates.
- xpaulbettsx 16y agoThis is important if you're running a website too - this exploit can be used to take over the machine if the hacker finds a way to execute code as the website (i.e. once they used a different exploit to break in, they would be able to escalate from www-data user to root).
- zokier 16y agoIs this bug restricted to ubuntu or does it affect debian/rhel etc?
- callahad 16y agoI can't seem to replicate on a Debian unstable box, where pam hasn't been updated since April [0], but I don't have an Ubuntu box handy to verify that I'm properly trying to exploit it. [0]: http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/pam.html http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/pam.html
- joeyh 16y agoThe security hole was introduced by a Ubuntu-specfic patch to pam. The pam_motd-legal-notice patch was added in July 2009 due to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/399071 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/399071
- afhof 16y agoIt didn't work on 9.04, which I guess is good.
- billybob 16y agoDumb question - what's PAM? To me that means "phone as modem"...
- callahad 16y agoPluggable Authentication Modules. It's an auth framework used by many Linux distributions. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pluggable_Authentication_Modules http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pluggable_Authentication_Module... and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_PAM http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_PAM
- xpaulbettsx 16y agoPAM lets you among other things, define new methods of authenticating the user - for example, if I wanted to make my computer log me on whenever it saw my Bluetooth phone in range, I'd write a PAM module
- poundy 16y agoI am on Ubuntu 10.04, what do I need to do besides updates and "proper" use to remain safe? I don't have an antivirus or anything of that sort!
- nuclear_eclipse 16y agoAssuming you're still using the default package mirrors, updating is sufficient.