> Doubly sad because if the anonymous survey linked in the post is true There were multiple revisions of the document (yay online text editors where this is po

> Doubly sad because if the anonymous survey linked in the post is true There were multiple revisions of the document (yay online text editors where this is possible). I understand that the leaked/published version is of a somewhat later date. That might explain both the amount of outrage compared to a text that many think is rather tame (the earlier version supposedly was more strongly worded), and it allows the interpretation that the survey mostly measured at which point in time the respondents (btw: who is represented in the sample?) read the text for their first, and probably last, time.