>a public corporation can't afford a persistent shadow of workplace discrimination I haven't read all of the memo, but it didn't seem to me that he was advocat

>a public corporation can't afford a persistent shadow of workplace discrimination I haven't read all of the memo, but it didn't seem to me that he was advocating discrimination. Wasn't the point that he claimed there _was_ discrimination and he wanted it to end? In any case, I can understand that actually discriminating in hiring could be illegal, but would _advocating for discrimination_ really be against the law, if that's what he actually did?