4 ms·

I mean measuring it and confirming there are positive/negative correlations. But either way, why not publish? Why not allow others to build from your work and

• nonbel 9y ago
  If you have reliable measurements then that falls under my number 1. There is no need for any vague theorizing, but go ahead and include it in the speculation sections (Intro/Discussion) if you like. Edit: If all that gets published is a correlation coefficient and not the distribution, scatterplots, etc. Then no, that paper is worthless.