> The exploit name certainly has sexually violent connotations to me. ....really? That seems like an incredible stretch. > I'm not condoning firing as a resp

> The exploit name certainly has sexually violent connotations to me. ....really? That seems like an incredible stretch. > I'm not condoning firing as a response - that's as thoughtless and unimaginative as the name. And perhaps the name isn't even if reason for it The article and the surrounding discussion makes it super, super clear that it's nothing to do with the name at all.