I was going to deride Slate for presumably being on the side of the people equating "Science" with truth at the March for Science just a few months ago, but it

I was going to deride Slate for presumably being on the side of the people equating "Science" with truth at the March for Science just a few months ago, but it turns out they had the exact same issue then: http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2017/04/the_march_for_science_was_eerily_religious.html http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/201... I figure if I was going to smear Slate for assumed hypocrisy, I should do the right thing and praise them for their (IMO, correct) consistency when I was wrong.