4 ms·
Given that he rates Vyrpr above PIA, when Vypr have had clear incidents of doing enough logging to identify which user has done something [1][2], and PIA do no
by gtf21 9y ago
Given that he rates Vyrpr above PIA, when Vypr have had clear incidents of doing enough logging to identify which user has done something [1][2], and PIA do no logging [3], I'm not particularly inclined to trust this analysis on the basis of which app is more "fun" to use.
Disclaimer: I used to use Vyrpr, when I found out about the logging, I switched to PIA, which I use with Tunnelblick anyway instead of their app. Furthermore, I can only really go by what they say, as I don't have inside access to their systems.
[1]: https://www.reddit.com/r/torrents/comments/17g53i/if_you_thought_you_were_safe_using_golden_frog/ https://www.reddit.com/r/torrents/comments/17g53i/if_you_tho...
[2]: https://www.goldenfrog.com/copyright https://www.goldenfrog.com/copyright
[3]: https://helpdesk.privateinternetaccess.com/hc/en-us/articles/219457547-Do-you-log-the-traffic-of-your-users- https://helpdesk.privateinternetaccess.com/hc/en-us/articles...
- averagewall 9y agoHe doesn't rate Vyper above PIA: Vyper: 8,2,0 PIA: 9,4,0 The stars are identified as being from his personal experience and he discusses the rationale behind them.
- jwfxpr 9y agoSince the entries on the site are ordered top-to-bottom based entirely on his subjective rating, ignoring the objective criteria, the list absolutely rates Vype higher, in both a figurative and literal sense, and in a way that implies that his 5-star ratings are far more important than the objective criteria.