4 ms·
I'm not sure what you mean by results. If you mean the results of a thought process that does not go beyond predicting positive/negative correlations, then I se
by nonbel 9y ago
I'm not sure what you mean by results. If you mean the results of a thought process that does not go beyond predicting positive/negative correlations, then I see no point to publishing it.
- IanCal 9y agoI mean measuring it and confirming there are positive/negative correlations. But either way, why not publish? Why not allow others to build from your work and reasoning up to now?
- nonbel 9y agoIf you have reliable measurements then that falls under my number 1. There is no need for any vague theorizing, but go ahead and include it in the speculation sections (Intro/Discussion) if you like. Edit: If all that gets published is a correlation coefficient and not the distribution, scatterplots, etc. Then no, that paper is worthless.