4 ms·
It's a false equivalency. One party's appointee fought for net neutrality and tried to regulated the ISPs as a utility; the other's is now actively dismantling
by pilsetnieks 9y ago
It's a false equivalency. One party's appointee fought for net neutrality and tried to regulated the ISPs as a utility; the other's is now actively dismantling everything his predecessor had accomplished, not even trying to pretend it's not in the ISPs' interests.
- ganoushoreilly 9y agoI'm speaking in a broader sense. Both parties have agendas, many of which behind closed doors equate to self improvement and consolidation of power. They just wrap the turd up in a red or blue bow.
- blhablhablha 9y agoThis is doubling down on the false equivalence. The phrase "broader sense" is a weak counter to the accurately identified flaw in your approach.