4 ms·
That's not proof. It's an observation that needs explaining. Scott Alexander's post[0], which was linked in TFA offers a plausible explanation. > My impression
by account2937858 9y ago
That's not proof. It's an observation that needs explaining. Scott Alexander's post[0], which was linked in TFA offers a plausible explanation.
> My impression is that there were lots of women in CS in 1980 for the same reason there were lots of Jews in banking in 1800: they were banned from doing anything else.
> Computer programming was originally considered sort of a natural outgrowth of being a secretary (remember, 77% of data entry specialists are still female today, probably because it’s also considered a natural outgrowth of being a secretary). Women had lots of opportunity in it, and a lot of women who couldn’t break into other professions naturally went into it.
> Then people let women become doctors and lawyers, so a bunch of the smart ones went off and did that instead.
> You can see the same thing going on with teachers. There’s been a huge decline in the percent of the most talented women who become teachers.
[0] https://slatestarcodex.com/2017/08/07/contra-grant-on-exaggerated-differences/#comment-533594 https://slatestarcodex.com/2017/08/07/contra-grant-on-exagge...
- ucaetano 9y agoThat explanation doesn't match the chart: There weren't a lot of women in CS. They were growing, just like other fields. And then, suddenly, they stopped growing and started declining.
- account2937858 9y agoIt did rise most sharply in CS because it was open to women early on when women joined the labor market (previously either holding non-degree jobs or being stay-at-home wives). Once other fields opened up too they left CS for those fields which aligned more with their interests. Maybe there might be two effects at work here: Women joining a field early that was seen as a female job (computer secretaries) that did not align with their interests while conversely men started to join more when the job became more stereotyped as a "male activity" while at the same time being aligned with their interest. Contrast the business curve which also saw an early increase but also is more of a people-interest thing, thus did not see a decline.
- ucaetano 9y ago> It did rise most sharply in CS because it was open to women early on when women joined the labor market (previously either holding non-degree jobs or being stay-at-home wives). Once other fields opened up too they left CS for those fields which aligned more with their interests. Again, that doesn't match the chart: http://www.randalolson.com/wp-content/uploads/percent-bachelors-degrees-women-usa.png http://www.randalolson.com/wp-content/uploads/percent-bachel...