2 ms·
I don't dismiss it because I have no idea what it's about. The church he founded was one of the major annoyances of the latter half of the 20th century. If yo
by kafkaesq 9y ago
I don't dismiss it because I have no idea what it's about.
The church he founded was one of the major annoyances of the latter half of the 20th century. If you're interested in the general history of Really Bad Ideas (and how they draw otherwise warm sensitive, intelligent people into their fold), you might want to look into it.
Let's just say I've considered the works of a lot cranks and crackpots, over the years - and a lot of viewpoints that, while not quite in that category, are just muddled and inflammatory and don't have a lot to offer to the discussion.
Enough to develop a pretty reliable sense of "smell" as to whether a given piece of work merits further exploration beyond a few paragraphs or so.
So whether or not one thinks he should be fired for it -- his "manifesto" definitely does not pass that smell test.
That's my view. If you view his work differently, that's fine for you.
- jessaustin 9y agoLet's just say I've considered the works of a lot cranks and crackpots, over the years... Is that like, a hobby? And by "considered", do you mean you read them, or skimmed them, or just heard about them from uptight censorious authoritarians on the internet?
- kafkaesq 9y agoIs that like, a hobby? Actually it was, for a while. And I actually did read a lot of these works; and considered their points, very carefully; and debated them with their adherents, very patiently and thoughtfully. Until I figured out what general superstructure of thought patterns was behind their arguments (which mostly boil down to: cherry picking; what-about-ism; and "authority, authority authority") -- and moved on other things.