> There's really no need for such a personal attack here - why do you feel a need to lash out at this author? the whole blog post is lashing out at something.

> There's really no need for such a personal attack here - why do you feel a need to lash out at this author? the whole blog post is lashing out at something. You reap what you sow. There's no "these are the tradeoffs, and this is why I disagree with those tradeoffs"; every argument goes like this: - I have an expectation - that expectation is informed by my priors, not by Go - Go didn't meet my expectations - even though Go never made or promised to meet those expectation, I'm going to be mad that it didn't do something that I wanted that was never promised the whole article is structured like "Go wants me to think in a different way than I already think and I refuse to think in a new way".