> a) it's an open semi-public manifesto against a company policy It was an internal memo in good civil form posted internally opening to an internal debate on

> a) it's an open semi-public manifesto against a company policy It was an internal memo in good civil form posted internally opening to an internal debate on a subject related to work conditions. Despite Gizmodo's obvious attempt to frame it as such, it was not posted as a revolutionary manifesto. It was public only when leaked by someone else. Notice how that person has not been fired. > addresses sensitive and controversial issues. So if a company makes a sensitive and controversial issue an internal policy, nobody should be allowed to question it? Really? Are you still confident in your judgment?