5 ms·
I sometimes wonder if a lot of the freshly educated programmers I hire really know what they are in for. In 25 years they'll still have 25-30 years of work lef
by eksemplar 9y ago
I sometimes wonder if a lot of the freshly educated programmers I hire really know what they are in for.
In 25 years they'll still have 25-30 years of work left in their lives, and by then most of them won't have received any significant reschooling, and they will still be competing in a tech world, where 10 years ago there wasn't a thing called smartphones.
Some of them will do just fine. I know a lot of old programmers, but I also know a lot of former older IT employees who are spending their 60ies in the unemployment lines.
- aianus 9y ago> In 25 years they'll still have 25-30 years of work left in their lives If you don't care about having a wife or kids you can easily retire forever after 10-15 years of work in SV or NYC.
- sotojuan 9y agoThe amount of people who will actually do this and go through it is so tiny that this comment is worthless. Give and take a few years (and perhaps not in SF/NYC), you could say this about any decent paying job.
- justforFranz 9y agoOr you'll spend it all on rent?
- vecinu 9y agoWhy would you do that if your goal is to retire early? In 10-15 years in SV/NY you can earn $1MM after tax + growth and then move to a lower COL city/town and take it easy.
- pm90 9y agoThe problem with that is that your COL in those 10-15 years is significantly impacted. That's probably 10% of your entire life. While I understand some people might be comfortable with the tradeoff... its important to remember there is something you are giving up.
- vecinu 9y agoI don't think I understand what you're giving up in that 10% of your life. I'm living in a studio, have a parking spot, walk to work and go out with my coworkers/friends after work. What am I missing out on?
- gozur88 9y agoAfter tax? Sure, it's possible, but there aren't actually that many people who make $300k/yr.
- aianus 9y ago$100k after tax is only $140k pretax
- gozur88 9y agoEh... sure, if you're only paying federal taxes. But in on that $140k you're going to end up with about $92k. And everything is more expensive in cities. The idea you're going to live in SF and save more than about half that, even living like a monk, is kind of fanciful. NYC is even worse - lop another thousand off and pay even more to live.
- aianus 9y agoI've personally lived in both cities and you can live perfectly well on $4k a month with a couple of roommates. Better than the average American even. Then, if you invest $46k a year for 15 years at a real return of 4% you end up with ~$943k in present day dollars which is right around what the parent was saying. Not to mention $140k total compensation is relatively low for a senior dev in SF/NYC, you will likely be making a lot more 10 years in.
- gozur88 9y agoYou can't, really. Not in the US. There's no way you can budget health care for that many years.
- the_gastropod 9y agoYes you can. 1. mrmoneymustache.com 2. earlyretirementextreme.com 3. gocurrycracker.com 4. madfientist.com 5. thepowerofthrift.com (I could go on for a while here) It's not only perfectly possible, it's not particularly difficult.
- gozur88 9y agoNo, that doesn't address the problem at all. If you retire thirty years before you qualify for medicare, you have no idea what your medical expenses will be. None. They could amount to millions of dollars over those three decades, depending on your particular issues, and you're never going to close that gap by minimizing expenses.
- the_gastropod 9y agoIt does. Just because you aren't comfortable with that risk doesn't mean it's impossible. It just means your risk tolerance is lower than the aforementioned people who did retire 30 years early.
- gozur88 9y agoWell, if you're willing to be homeless you can retire any time you'd like.
- wbl 9y agoThe principles are the same, the details change.
- laythea 9y agoAn engineer educates him/herself with foundational knowledge, supplemented off course, with programming. By "foundational knowledge" I mean the knowledge and experience in the application of software to solve real world problems. The insight you gain doing that, makes you an engineer, not a programmer. And this makes you valuable. More valuable than a kid of the street who knows the latest buzzword tech. Moral of the story: Be an Engineer, not a Programmer. Be Valuable, not Replaceable.
- eksemplar 9y agoTrue, but engineering and CS moves forward as well, and freshly educated engineers cost less money than you.
- abledon 9y agoWhy don't they go back to school and do a 2yr trade degree w internship
- scottLobster 9y agoWell yeah, the old "job for life" where one specific set of skills with perhaps some minor updating here and there is good for 40 years is long gone. Sadly many were raised with different expectations.
- eksemplar 9y agoWell there is that, but there is also an unwillingness to reeducate especially in the private sector. I've worked in public service all my life and I took a master degree in business and leadership which was paid by my employeer. Which moved me from engineering to management. When I see my old study buddies, who all work privately, none of them have gotten any form of reeducation and very few have kept up with the tech. I'm sure most of them could learn the new buzzwords if they wanted to, but who would hire them until they do when you could simply pick a fresh candidate with newer CS knowledge, all the buzz and a lower pay requirement?