3 ms·
> But sexism isn’t the result of knowing facts; it’s the result of what people choose to do with them. We know that men are taller than women. I can see you a
by dm319 9y ago
> But sexism isn’t the result of knowing facts; it’s the result of what people choose to do with them.
We know that men are taller than women. I can see you agreeing, but actually this statement is ambiguous, because these two are not the same thing:
A man is taller than a women
On average, men are taller than women
Sexism is taking a random male and a random female, and claiming that despite all the facts presented to you, the male is taller than the female. It doesn't matter that in a specific case a female is taller than a male.
The same can be applied to any group and their respective stereotype. The *ism happens when we fail to assess an individual on the data given to us, preferring to fall back on mentally-lazy stereotypes/generalisations even when what we can see says something different.
A single study, published in 2015, did claim that male
and female brains existed along a “mosaic” and that it
isn’t possible to differentiate them by sex, but this has
been refuted by four – yes, four – academic studies since.
This includes a study that analyzed the exact same brain
data from the original study and found that the sex of a
given brain could be correctly identified with 69-per-cent
to 77-per-cent accuracy.
Well I'd argue that isn't great accuracy as 50% is what you'd expect from chance (though I haven't read those references). In fact, I might expect a similar accuracy from a machine-learning technique to predict sex based on your height.
I haven't touched on the causes of population differences. With height, I don't think anyone thinks it's anything other than genetic (by way of testosterone levels). For interests and skills, the proportion that is caused by testosterone versus culture/environment is still unclear.
If we believe there is still a cultural effect, then I think positive discrimination is justified to counter this.
As an anecdote, we were wondering why our four-year old son suddenly lost interest in 'Frozen'. He told us this week that a girl had told him at nursery that 'Frozen' wasn't for boys. Cultural stereotype reinforcement is alive and well, and starts early!
- agarden 9y ago> Sexism is taking a random male and a random female, and claiming that despite all the facts presented to you, the male is taller than the female. It doesn't matter that in a specific case a female is taller than a male. Upvoted for this. Great definition of sexism. > Well I'd argue that isn't great accuracy as 50% is what you'd expect from chance.... In fact, I might expect a similar accuracy from a machine-learning technique to predict sex based on your height. ...With height, I don't think anyone thinks it's anything other than genetic.... If the method is probably as good at predicting sex as one based on height, which everyone agrees is genetic, then why isn't that great accuracy?
- Chris2048 9y ago> our four-year old son suddenly lost interest in 'Frozen' As a counterpoint, if society was as clear that "My little pony" was also not for boys, Bronies might not exist..
- daughart 9y agoThere is a tremendous environmental component to height. Women in South Korea have gained 8 inches in height, on average, in the past century. They are now taller on average than Korean men a century ago, despite no genetic differences.