5 ms·
Because surely the half that didn't vote wouldn't have voted for him either. So really, when you think about it, 75% of the country voted for Clinton.
by xienze 9y ago
Because surely the half that didn't vote wouldn't have voted for him either. So really, when you think about it, 75% of the country voted for Clinton.
- kazagistar 9y ago... wat? You cant just count nonvoters for your candidate. They chose not to vote as a way to say your candidate sucks.
- xienze 9y agoWell you obviously missed the sarcasm. I was making fun of the stupidity of the "ACKSHUALLY only 25% of the country voted for him" argument, which is needless pedantry and ignores that we can infer how the rest of the country _likely_ would have voted since we have such a large sample size.
- danharaj 9y agoYou realize that {people who voted} is no where near an independent random sample and has far less power than its size suggests?
- theWatcher37 9y agoThis is a rediculous assertion