4 ms·
According to my understanding, rimliu is proposing that wage ~ education + experience + gender + race + additional_factors + error where additional_factors
by dp-tyvek 9y ago
According to my understanding, rimliu is proposing that
wage ~ education + experience + gender + race + additional_factors + error
where additional_factors consists of other unknown factors (e.g. charisma, intelligence, appearance?). In which case, if education, experience, gender and race are kept constant, there is still going to be a fair bit of variance in wage caused by these unknown factors.
Either way, it would be pretty hard to model when these factors are far from orthogonal. Imagine the impact race would have on work experience if race is a big factor when hiring people.
- xapata 9y agoLooking at it a different way, if productivity is defined as the combination of all relevant features (education, experience, ethics, etc.) then racism/sexism imply non-zero coefficients in wage ~ productivity + race + gender This also assumes a competitive market where wage will asymptotically approach productivity.