3 ms·
To people who are flagging this article: why don't you read it? It's important, and the author is competent.
by dvfjsdhgfv 9y ago
To people who are flagging this article: why don't you read it? It's important, and the author is competent.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- marsRoverDev 9y agoBecause it doesn't align with their worldview, and the wrong kind of thought must be quashed.
- c0nducktr 9y agoOr maybe people are just tired of seeing constant posts about this story.
- akamaka 9y agoThis article is trash. Who is claiming that there are no gender differences across the population? Who is she arguing against exactly? Maybe the author should have actually read the manifesto more carefully, because it is primarily an argument about Google's hiring practices and how to build the best workforce for a company, a topic which the scientific studies she cites do not address in the slightest.
- avenoir 9y ago> Who is claiming that there are no gender differences across the population? About a quarter of comments on the original manifesto thread here on HN were from people who explicitly stated that there are no differences between genders and wanted scientific proof if someone were to refute their statement.
- akamaka 9y agoI don't think that's accurate. Nobody was trying to refute the science that was cited by the manifesto writer. There were many comments arguing that environmental factors are more important, or pointing out that the science of testosterone's effect hasn't been directly connected to job performance, which I think are great subjects to debate.
- jp_sc 9y agoShe is arguing against the way the memo was reported by the media. Like this piece http://gizmodo.com/men-have-always-used-science-to-explain-why-theyre-bett-1797608461 http://gizmodo.com/men-have-always-used-science-to-explain-w...
- akamaka 9y agoThat article is trash as well, and it fairly got flagged when it was posted here. I think HN is a place for a more enlightened discussion.