He made a mistake thinking that actual diversity in opinion is accepted. This is nothing but a witch hunt because people don't like his viewpoints, or think his

He made a mistake thinking that actual diversity in opinion is accepted. This is nothing but a witch hunt because people don't like his viewpoints, or think his viewpoints may "offend" protected groups. It's bullying plain and simple, which I absolutely abhor. And I won't entirely fault Google for it. In this case they're just a proxy through which certain politically powerful groups exert control over those that dare dissent. They're in a tough position in-between the whole debate. And as accepted, they've chosen the historically-accepted solution to this problem: Pander to the offended. Nuance or fact are irrelevant. Like one of the other posters mentioned, this will only embolden and give ammunition to the other side. I.e. the one that is bullied by this action. When we can't have reasonable debate on touchy topics, you only breed resentment. It will blow up eventually.