Patterns are useless until they demonstrate they have predictive power. > A pattern, apart from the term's use to mean "template",[a] is a discernible regulari

Patterns are useless until they demonstrate they have predictive power. > A pattern, apart from the term's use to mean "template",[a] is a discernible regularity in the world or in a manmade design. As such, the elements of a pattern repeat in a predictable manner https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pattern https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pattern So using a lot of text to depict such pattern while on the other hand indicating such pattern cannot generalize feels like wrestling with yourself. Did he try to prove himself that this 'on average' model is a bad model?