4 ms·
>Office 2007 was a pretty good redesign of the suite, but Office 2010 doesn't seem to have raised the bar much. I don't know if you use Outlook (I'm guessing n
by endtime 16y ago
>Office 2007 was a pretty good redesign of the suite, but Office 2010 doesn't seem to have raised the bar much.
I don't know if you use Outlook (I'm guessing not) but Outlook 2010's handling of threading makes it a huge improvement over 2007, IMO.
- troygoode 16y agoI do use Office. I'm a dev in a ".NET shop" and the org is Windows all the way around so I most certainly do use Office. That said, I'm not using Office for anything fancy: lots and lots of Outlook, some basic Word-based requirements docs, a bunch of Excel, and the rare Powerpoint. I also have a pretty monster rig at work, and never had any performance problems with 2007. I upgraded to 2010 during beta and am running the release right now. I like it (the UI improvements in Outlook are nice), but it doesn't strike me as a "must have" upgrade over 2007. It _certainly_ isn't an upgrade I would've spent $100+ of my _own_ money on. I use GoogleDocs at home for personal use.
- endtime 16y agoFair enough. The threading is the killer feature for me, but I guess the value of that varies with personal preference.