> The document is the definition of sexism I would love some examples of your accusation. You say it's the "definition of sexism". So you must have plenty of e

> The document is the definition of sexism I would love some examples of your accusation. You say it's the "definition of sexism". So you must have plenty of examples from his writing. > and a perfect example of why we still need diversity laws and programs. Yes. The fact the guy got fired for having his own opinions proves that we are in a dire need for diversity of thought and ideas. > For example the belief that women do not have as high as drive for status can (and previously has been) used as an excuse for promoting men instead of women or a particular man instead of a particular woman. But that's societal/evolutionary theory proposed by some scientists/thinkers? Also, the belief that women can't compete with men physically is used as an excuse to created women's tennis assocation, WNBA, women's hockey, women's soccer, etc? Is that sexist? There is sexism and there is biological facts/inquiry/etc. He was just offering a possible explanation for why more men are in leadership roles. "The greater tendency for men to be interested in having a higher status fits with a long line of biological research dating back to Darwin. It seems men believe that higher status brings the mating opportunities that come with being top dog." https://phys.org/news/2012-12-women-money-men-status.html https://phys.org/news/2012-12-women-money-men-status.html http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/early/2010/12/04/rspb.2010.2145 http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/early/2010/12... http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/evolution/9005552/Men-twice-as-likely-to-take-risks.html http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/evolution/9005552/Me... It's almost as if humans were evolutionarily driven to be this way. Is science and discussing scientific topics now bigotry? If that's why people are upset and if that's why he got fired, then google is going to lose and he's going to be wealthy.