7 ms·
I'm not even sure i could watch $50/month of streaming content. I can barely keep up with HBO and Netflix pumping out content on a weekly basis. I could see a
by throwaway91111 9y ago
I'm not even sure i could watch $50/month of streaming content. I can barely keep up with HBO and Netflix pumping out content on a weekly basis.
I could see a family buying a plethora of bundles, but I strongly suspect it will continue to be cheaper than the equivalent cable package.
I can't speak at all for sports; i imagine that alone could be hundreds a month to watch a local game.
- macspoofing 9y ago>I could see a family buying a plethora of bundles, but I strongly suspect it will continue to be cheaper than the equivalent cable package. You may be right but I just don't think the industry can go from taking in $50-100/mo to $10/mo - they will figure out a way. And people didn't mind paying that amount. What people disliked was the forced bundles and less flexibility compared to what pirating gave you. >I can't speak at all for sports; i imagine that alone could be hundreds a month to watch a local game. NBA is about $200/season - which isn't bad given that's for every game. When local telecoms that bought rights for local games wise up it won't even be that much.
- throwaway91111 9y agoI thought NBA access gave you everything BUT your local team?