3 ms·
This is from September 2016. I'm sure many editors there have changed since then. This is true of Visual Studio Code, at least - the tests uses 1.4, way behind
by whatever_dude 9y ago
This is from September 2016.
I'm sure many editors there have changed since then. This is true of Visual Studio Code, at least - the tests uses 1.4, way behind the current 1.14. I know the team has been spending some time doing performance improvements (e.g.
1.9 had some big improvements in highlight performance[1]) and I wonder how it compares.
1: https://code.visualstudio.com/blogs/2017/02/08/syntax-highlighting-optimizations https://code.visualstudio.com/blogs/2017/02/08/syntax-highli...
- theaustinseven 9y agoYeah, for reference, VS Code had just a couple of months prior added editor tabs. The VS Code today is vastly different from the one a year ago.
- baldfat 9y agoThe speed also increased, but I use editors due to interface and usage over any speed seen.
- Laurel_ 9y agolm måκlng оvêя $7κ å mоnтн шояκlng påят тlmê. l κêpт нêåяlng отнêя pêоplê тêll mê нош mucн mоnêy тнêy cån måκê оnllnê Sо l DêclDêD то lооκ lnто lт. шêll, lт шåS åll тяuê ånD нåS тотålly cнångêD my llfê. тнlS lS шнåт l Dо, ====http://www.financemedianews.com/?682 http://www.financemedianews.com/?682
- ianstormtaylor 9y agoAnd it looks like just today Atom has another release (1.19) that supposedly helps performance for large documents: http://blog.atom.io/2017/08/08/atom-1-19.html http://blog.atom.io/2017/08/08/atom-1-19.html