3 ms·
Which NoSQL Platform is Right For You?
- vyrotek 16y agoWhere is Windows Azure Table Storage?
- tbrownaw 16y agoIs that really a sane question to ask? "I don't know what my datastore requirements are, but I do know I don't want anything that supports this particular standardized interface. What's available?"
- sjs 16y agoThey should include all datastores and recommend the best one, be it relational, k/v, document, or whatever.
- sjs 16y agoTop 7 results for me: Voldemort, Scalaris, Cassandra, Riak, Tokyo Tyrant, Terrastore, CouchDB. We're already using Riak and have no plans to change.
- cherring 16y agoYeah, Riak was suspiciously absent from the choices ... That's the one I like the best at the moment.
- moomba 16y agoNot sure I'd call neo4j NoSQL. Its a graph DB as listed in the link. Is the new trend to call any data store that is not SQL, NoSQL. I even heard Lucene being called NoSQL, http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2010/04/30/nosql-lucene-and-solr/ http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2010/04/30/nosql-lucene.... I guess search engines are NoSQL now?
- jeberle 16y agoThe survey doesn't include BerkeleyDB? Half the packages are either built on it or are knock-offs. VSAM KSDS, anyone? Booyeah!
- jedsmith 16y agoResponse of most of the NoSQL advocates I've spoken to: BerkeleyDB was written before I was a programmer, therefore it cannot be trusted since it's "old".
- dermatthias 16y agoWhy is CouchDB taken out when I choose "Object-oriented: No" ? To quote the CouchDB website: "What it is Not" An object-oriented database. Or more specifically, meant to function as a seamless persistence layer for an OO programming language.
- petervandijck 16y agoWithout any info about your requirements, MySQL is most likely the best choice for now. Also, the same as with programming languages, at some point it doesn't really matter.