4 ms·
>The idea that nuclear weapons are what's keeping them from being attacked is simply stupid. I guess you think the top experts are "simply stupid" then: http:
by bluthru 9y ago
>The idea that nuclear weapons are what's keeping them from being attacked is simply stupid.
I guess you think the top experts are "simply stupid" then:
http://www.npr.org/2017/03/29/521909787/the-u-s-has-an-active-cyber-war-underway-to-thwart-the-north-korean-nuclear-thre http://www.npr.org/2017/03/29/521909787/the-u-s-has-an-activ...
https://www.samharris.org/podcast/item/must-we-accept-a-nuclear-north-korea https://www.samharris.org/podcast/item/must-we-accept-a-nucl...
- Sangermaine 9y agoI'm not sure what your point is, since neither of those links espouse the position that nuclear weapons are the only reason North Korea hasn't been attacked. No one is saying NK having nuclear weapons isn't a threat or a danger. It's just simply an oft-repeated idiocy that you have to have nukes or the US will attack you. The US didn't go to war with NK for the 60 years prior to them having nukes, either, because other deterrents exist in the situation. It's a childish understanding of what's going on.