3 ms·
It’s not about free speech in general. It’s about a specific narrative, wherein free speech on college campuses is under serious threat thanks to liberal ortho
by comex 9y ago
It’s not about free speech in general. It’s about a specific narrative, wherein free speech on college campuses is under serious threat thanks to liberal orthodoxy, usually linked to concepts such as trigger warnings and microaggressions. This narrative is currently in vogue on the right, and thus making a fuss about campus censorship is likely to indicate a right-wing persuasion.
Of course, the issue itself is very complex, and as a self-described leftist I happen to believe there’s some room to be concerned about free speech on campus (although I view the causes and nature of the issue very differently from the typical right-wing perspective) - but that’s not the point. When I called out those “free speech” references, I didn’t mean to make any statement about the merits of the issue; I was more using it as a sort of shibboleth, given the context of current trends in political discourse.
- jshevek 9y agoIt wasn't a "narrative" when hundreds of leftists physically attacked many dozens of random, innocent people over the course of 3 events in Berkeley.
- alphapapa 9y ago> I was more using it as a sort of shibboleth, given the context of current trends in political discourse. This whole situation arose because someone pointed out a lack of rational discourse, the emotional overreactions and tribalism that deter discussion of the merits of the issue. Your response is to look for shibboleths to preemptively dismiss rational arguments you don't agree with, presuming yourself to be impartial. You are exhibiting the problematic behaviors in question, but it seems like you don't even realize it.