5 ms·
Like many others I got the idea because of an itch I had with work. I run a small SaaS and I found myself constantly creating and updating HTML pages of variou
by teleclimber 9y ago
Like many others I got the idea because of an itch I had with work.
I run a small SaaS and I found myself constantly creating and updating HTML pages of various types: help and documentation for users, landing pages, product description, in-app content etc... There are myriad solutions for each of these, but none really nailed the use-case to me so I imagined what I really wanted and started building it.
It's taken a long time but Cicerone is getting close to an alpha release. Basically it's the most pleasant way of creating structured HTML content that I could come up with. http://cicerone.co http://cicerone.co
- quickthrower2 9y agoCan it be summarised as React for static sites?
- teleclimber 9y agoThere is a similarity with React (and Vue, etc...) in that it's based on the idea of components. But the similarity ends there (and the project is not based on React). The core capability is to interact with your page directly as you build it, something that is not within React's scope.
- laktek 9y agoNice! Looks pretty similar to what I'm building at https://pragma.build https://pragma.build (if you like to try Pragma send me a DM on Twitter @pragmaApp)
- teleclimber 9y agoThanks! Yes I think there are bunch of us trying to rethink rich editors (for example: all the block-based editors, prosemirror, WP's Gutenberg, etc...)