The point is there's a difference between saying I'm biologically predisposed to some preference, and I'm biologically ill-equipped to achieve something. If yo

The point is there's a difference between saying I'm biologically predisposed to some preference, and I'm biologically ill-equipped to achieve something. If you don't see how important this difference is, consider this: if someone is biologically ill-equipped to do something, it's easy to justify not hiring them. If they're predisposed against interest in something, it's easy to simply hire the ones who are interested (their mere application is already a strong indicator against whatever biological predisposition). edit: That's all to say that saying someone is "biologically ill-equipped" is clearly problematic, while saying someone is "biologically predisposed against interest in x" is maybe problematic, and if so, much less problematic than the former claim.