> Not only is he wrong That's merely your opinion, which clearly can be seen from the comments here, has disagreement. > he made an extended case for the wron

> Not only is he wrong That's merely your opinion, which clearly can be seen from the comments here, has disagreement. > he made an extended case for the wrong argument and did it in a way that inflict maximum company damage. How did he inflict damage on the company? Whoever leaked this internal memo did the damage, but I haven't seen any witch hunt or firing in that regard. Strange, eh?