>If it is unverified (and quite damning), why publish it? They are reporting on the effects of unsubstantiated reports, not publishing them as fact. A far cry

>If it is unverified (and quite damning), why publish it? They are reporting on the effects of unsubstantiated reports, not publishing them as fact. A far cry from BB knowingly publishing falsehoods. >Has the NYT ever claimed that Trump met prostitutes in Moscow? Go ahead, find a link saying they have. You skipped over that part. Have they ever claimed that?