3 ms·
No because 100:100 and 0:0 would be equal in value but far different in meaning. It must be a score and not a ratio.
by 5ilv3r 9y ago
No because 100:100 and 0:0 would be equal in value but far different in meaning. It must be a score and not a ratio.
- jnbiche 9y agoYes, but that's not what this ratio purports to measure. Also, the fact that you wrote n:n with the colon in between would make it by definition a ratio.