'Arbitrarily' switch job classifications? Sorry, what is the reality grounding of classifying IT jobs as 'thing-oriented'? It seems about as scientific as the

'Arbitrarily' switch job classifications? Sorry, what is the reality grounding of classifying IT jobs as 'thing-oriented'? It seems about as scientific as the zodiac. Tell me, if you're a programmer, how much time do you spend communicating with people versus actually coding? How much time reading and writing documentation? Choosing variable and class names to communicate your code's intentions? Can you see how classifying IT jobs as something women aren't interested in, leads to finding a 'result' that women aren't interested in IT jobs? That's literally a tautology.