4 ms·
Actually your comment is crap and comes out as Xenophobic outburst. Rather than critiquing the article you resort to belittling someone's name and religion whic
by indogooner 9y ago
Actually your comment is crap and comes out as Xenophobic outburst. Rather than critiquing the article you resort to belittling someone's name and religion which is deplorable.
- rajadigopula 9y agoI am critiquing the article. The author of article is doing exactly that, belittling the base of Hindus beliefs with personal agenda. I see no other explanation other than that. This has became a common theme by non-Hindus in India to come up with crappy evidences to attack the roots of Hinduism in disguise of decent looking articles like this one and fool the intellects which should be stopped.
- exhilaration 9y agoIt's very hard to see how you're critiquing the article by starting with an analysis of the author's name.
- rajadigopula 9y agoIt's actually simple, no one wastes so much time on digging a 2000 to 3000 bc evidence to attack the roots of Hindu beliefs other than the one who has a personal agenda attached to it. Did the author actually an archaeologist and dug the proof himself? Or he's merely mentioning some remote to unknown evidence only he magically came across when the whole world is believing the opposite till now?1
- jalayir 9y agoIn the article, the author clearly provides clickable references in the form of hyperlinked text. I don't think he claims "he dug the proof himself".
- rajadigopula 9y agoHe also did link to his old article on same topic - https://scroll.in/article/732899/video-an-animated-map-which-explains-how-the-aryans-bought-sanskrit-to-india https://scroll.in/article/732899/video-an-animated-map-which... - in which the last paragraphs clearly highlights his intentions.
- astrodust 9y agoThat's called academic skepticism. Maybe you're unfamiliar with it.
- rajadigopula 9y agoI understand that & I did that too for my dissertation, but the author made some sarcastic and furious wording in the last paragraphs in his old article giving a unambiguous peeking into his actual intentions on his view of people whose beliefs he's attacking.
- astrodust 9y agoI think you're reading way too much into this. If the author has an opinion on the subject that doesn't mean they're wrong. You can be completely correct and also a dick.