4 ms·
> reacting to a clear violation. If it's so clear, then could you specify exactly which parts of the memo were "fair to debate" (as Pichai says) and which part
by SamBam 9y ago
> reacting to a clear violation.
If it's so clear, then could you specify exactly which parts of the memo were "fair to debate" (as Pichai says) and which part were "clear violation?"
- joshuamorton 9y agoPichai does in the note.
- nailer 9y agoWhere?
- joshuamorton 9y ago>So to be clear again, many points raised in the memo—such as the portions criticizing Google’s trainings, questioning the role of ideology in the workplace, and debating whether programs for women and underserved groups are sufficiently open to all—are important topics. The author had a right to express their views on those topics—we encourage an environment in which people can do this and it remains our policy to not take action against anyone for prompting these discussions.
- nailer 9y agoSorry I should have been clearer: which parts were the clear violation?