3 ms·
Arguing that unproven methods of fighting sexism/racism aren't as effective as everyone claims they are and that said methods are potentially harmful isn't the
by Zarath 9y ago
Arguing that unproven methods of fighting sexism/racism aren't as effective as everyone claims they are and that said methods are potentially harmful isn't the same as being sexist/racist. I feel like the author is attempting to make the point that such practices aren't really in anyone's interest except the outward appearance of the company.
- etchalon 9y agoNo, the author is attempting to argue that the practices are irrelevant or ineffective because the default state, without them, is the natural one. He very explicitly is arguing that policies designed to correct the natural state are sexist/racist on their own, and have to be discarded. He then hints at having a strong bias towards believing sexist/racist conclusions from a limited reading of a limited amount of information.