3 ms·
> Why would that be the case? If free societies don't want to defend - they are conquered by the oppressed societies, and cease to be free. And it's not like
by ajuc 9y ago
> Why would that be the case?
If free societies don't want to defend - they are conquered by the oppressed societies, and cease to be free.
And it's not like in modern Europe there are no wars (Russia-Ukraine for one example), or aggressive dictatorships (Russia, Turkey, less agressive but 100% dictatorship Belarus, and a few more dictatorships in making, all of them using nationalism as the building block).
- democracy 9y agoBelarus is indeed very agressive, only New Zealand Empire can stop it from its attempts to conquer the world...
- ajuc 9y agohttps://www.article19.org/resources.php/resource/38692/en/belarus:-mass-detentions-and-police-violence-against-peaceful-demonstrators-warrant-strong-reaction-by-international-community https://www.article19.org/resources.php/resource/38692/en/be... I wrote it's "less agressive", but it's still a dictatorship.
- democracy 9y agoIt is also an Eastern europeam country with a population of 10m people (link to wikipedia to be added). Does this fact make it more or less agressive?
- ajuc 9y agoIt's aggressive towards its own people, not towards neighbors. And it's a dictatorship, so it can change in a moment. These facts make it a possible threat.
- democracy 9y agoIt is also an Eastern europeam country with a population of 10m people (link to wikipedia to be added). Does this fact make it more or less agressive?