3 ms·
> It's worth remembering that one of his conclusions was to end or replace gender-based diversity programs at Google. Given that, it's easy to understand why pe
by Simon_says 9y ago
> It's worth remembering that one of his conclusions was to end or replace gender-based diversity programs at Google. Given that, it's easy to understand why people would be upset. If gender-based diversity programs are responsible for qualified women getting jobs that they otherwise wouldn't have gotten due to bias, then the lack of that program means those women wouldn't have gotten those jobs.
This is not exactly a strong counter-argument.
- lurker69 9y ago> If gender-based diversity programs are responsible... > If... Nothing empirical in that sentence just assumption. And even if we assume that statement is true, on the other side of same coin are qualified men that didn't get job solely because of their genitalia.
- Simon_says 9y agoExactly. A very reasonable document is criticized as being "unscientific" or "discredited", and when pressed for specific inaccuracies, this is the best response? The left and corporate culture has gone full retard on this issue.