4 ms·
#1: I don't see any support for your summary. It says instead "Interestingly, females in sales jobs appear to receive more callbacks than males; however, this (
by in3d 9y ago
#1: I don't see any support for your summary. It says instead "Interestingly, females in sales jobs appear to receive more callbacks than males; however, this (reverse) gender gap is statistically insignificant and economically much smaller than any of the racial gaps discussed above."
I can easily dig up studies showing opposite results:
"Contrary to prevailing assumptions, men and women faculty members from all four fields preferred female applicants 2:1 over identically qualified males with matching lifestyles (single, married, divorced), with the exception of male economists, who showed no gender preference. " http://www.pnas.org/content/112/17/5360.abstract http://www.pnas.org/content/112/17/5360.abstract
"We found that the public servants engaged in positive (not negative) discrimination towards female and minority
candidates:
• Participants were 2.9% more likely to shortlist female candidates and 3.2% less likely to shortlist male applicants
when they were identifiable, compared with when they were de-identified."
https://pmc.gov.au/sites/default/files/publications/beta-unconscious-bias.pdf https://pmc.gov.au/sites/default/files/publications/beta-unc...
"Teaching accreditation exams reveal grading biases favor women in male-dominated disciplines in France" http://science.sciencemag.org/content/353/6298/474 http://science.sciencemag.org/content/353/6298/474
- odbol_ 9y agoThose studies have tiny sample sizes, and aren't even in the tech industry.
- in3d 9y agoI was making a counterpoint to the parent post. Note the links there, nothing much to do with tech. And you're completely wrong about sample sizes: "Comparisons of oral non–gender-blind tests with written gender-blind tests for about 100,000 individuals " "Over 2,100 public servants" "validation studies were conducted on 873 tenure-track faculty"