3 ms·
New Scientist ran a story[1] in 2000, covering Bryan Roberts - a professor an engineer at the University of Western Sydney in Australia - and his plan to build
by Jedd 9y ago
New Scientist ran a story[1] in 2000, covering Bryan Roberts - a professor an engineer at the University of Western Sydney in Australia - and his plan to build 'gyromills' that used wind power to stay airborne, generated electricity, and transferred that back to ground with a tether. He'd built his first proof of concept device in 1986.
Hadn't heard much about it since, but am reminded of the proposal every time someone comes up with a comparable design -- to generate electricity at high altitude, where where winds are consistent and strong, and property prices are low -- using some lighter than air or self-propelled vehicle.
I see the gyromill plan has since morphed into a company SkyWindPower[2] and appears to look more like a 4-prop drone now, coincidentally.
[1] https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg16722574-800-reach-for-the-sky/ https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg16722574-800-reach-fo...
[2] http://www.skywindpower.com/ http://www.skywindpower.com/
- aokholm 9y agoGyro mills are very fascinating, but I wouldn't have high hopes for them as sources of low cost energy. That is unless you could also fly the gyro mill in a crosswind manner. This article by Moritz Diehl describes very well the expected power output for a crosswind device. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f5da/681fe152e5a81264f8a919d3222cba7f45d4.pdf https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f5da/681fe152e5a81264f8a919.... Also it's important to note that the potential power output for any of these systems are proportional to the cosine of the tether angle, meaning that most of the advantage airborne systems to traditional turbines won't be so much that they can reach higher winds, but just the smaller amount of material required.