You argument would suggest this: If an organization does, at any time, use hiring priorities besides work ability, and thus hires people whose work ability was

You argument would suggest this: If an organization does, at any time, use hiring priorities besides work ability, and thus hires people whose work ability was not as good as it could be - from henceforth on, nobody can ever criticize those hiring policies, because that would imply criticizing the people hired under those policies. >Given that the document has (rightfully) alienated women inside and outside his organization, it becomes impossible for this person to be an effective member of the team Funny, lots of people I've worked with have alienated me, and others, and various groups of people (different teams, specialties, ages, men, conservatives, etc). We somehow still manage to keep functioning in the same building. You, with bigotry of low expectations, seem to think women don't have the maturity for that.