3 ms·

> The implications [...] are toxic. And therefore it is false?

• gizmo 9y ago
  It is false because the science is bunk. Social conditioning likely explains all (and definitely explains most) of the measured differences, not biology. The author has a popular science level understanding of gender differences. Based on that he concludes women are unsuited to be engineers compared to men.
  • qu4z-2 9y ago
    > It is false because the science is bunk. Well, then make that argument.