4 ms·
That post is only a personal opinion based on his own bias and prejudices without any scientific reference. Moreover it make claims about the article that the a
by jorgemf 9y ago
That post is only a personal opinion based on his own bias and prejudices without any scientific reference. Moreover it make claims about the article that the author hasn't made.
- donohoe 9y agoUmm. I think you should actually read it :)
- jorgemf 9y agoI read it.
- jrs95 9y agoNo, he's sort of right. He extrapolates a bit and makes it sound much worse than it was. For someone who is claiming to understand engineering so well it seems odd that he'd conflate arguments (that were poorly made imo) about preferences within a demographic group with accusing that group of being inferior at engineering. He never suggested women were bad at their jobs, just that maybe there was a biological component to why they were less interested in it to begin with. Edit: just to reiterate, I don't agree with that view, I'm convinced it's mostly cultural issues that are to blame.
- donohoe 9y agoHe covers one angle: why this is toxic and why Google has no choice but to terminate his employment For the rest, I'd go here: https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/evzjww/here-are-the-citations-for-the-anti-diversity-manifesto-circulating-at-google https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/evzjww/here-are-t...
- ryanSrich 9y agoNot only that, but he spends a considerable amount of time humble-bragging. I found that article unbearable.