3 ms·
...which is true and even google admits they do so to increase female count?
by notgood 9y ago
...which is true and even google admits they do so to increase female count?
- tptacek 9y agoI'm pretty sure Google does not in fact "admit they do [anything] to increase female count".
- notgood 9y agoOh they do, a lot: https://www.blog.google/topics/diversity/focusing-on-diversity30/ https://www.blog.google/topics/diversity/focusing-on-diversi... https://www.wsj.com/articles/tech-firms-borrow-football-play-to-increase-hiring-of-women-1474963562 https://www.wsj.com/articles/tech-firms-borrow-football-play... https://www.google.com/diversity/ https://www.google.com/diversity/ https://qz.com/604723/when-google-increased-paid-maternity-leave-the-rate-at-which-new-mothers-quit-dropped-50/ https://qz.com/604723/when-google-increased-paid-maternity-l... http://money.cnn.com/2017/06/29/technology/google-diversity-report/index.html http://money.cnn.com/2017/06/29/technology/google-diversity-...
- ubernostrum 9y agoThe claim made is that they "decreased the false negative rate". Google has long prided itself on rejecting large numbers of qualified candidates. Since decreasing the false-negative rate inherently means "hire a greater quantity of qualified candidates", I fail to see how the bar was lowered.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]