4 ms·
I don't know where everyone is reading their versions of the letter, but I don't think you could read the Gizmodo reprint and misrepresent the argument: https:
by hardwaresofton 9y ago
I don't know where everyone is reading their versions of the letter, but I don't think you could read the Gizmodo reprint and misrepresent the argument:
https://gizmodo.com/exclusive-heres-the-full-10-page-anti-diversity-screed-1797564320?rev=1501965015200 https://gizmodo.com/exclusive-heres-the-full-10-page-anti-di...
This is where I read up on it, and the letter was written very reasonably, IMO. That article also includes a response from google's brand new VP of Diversity, Integrity & Governance.
[EDIT] - original (as pointed out by the commenter below) is here: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3914586-Googles-Ideological-Echo-Chamber.html#document https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3914586-Googles-Ideo...
Read that instead
- Pilfer 9y agoGizmodo removed the citations to scientific studies and also took out the images. The original document is here (credit to lisper) https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3914586/Googles-Ideological-Echo-Chamber.pdf https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3914586/Googles-I...
- sanxiyn 9y agoThanks a lot. Citations are pretty much what I expected them to be, but it is good to know that good citations were made.
- hardwaresofton 9y agoThanks so much, couldn't find the original (can't say I tried very hard, all things considered).
- TazeTSchnitzel 9y agoIt's unfair to assume Gizmodo intentionally removed those. Much more likely is whoever leaked it to them did so in plaintext.
- casefields 9y agoIn their article Gizmodo said they removed links. So no, not just plaintext.
- Buge 9y agoGizmodo said they were removed. Not that Gizmodo removed them.